Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : S. B. Billimoria & Co. Vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2002- 2003
RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 18. The question to be decided is whether the payment to such retiring partners have been made on capital account or the same is a charge on the income of the firm being diverted by overriding charge. Reading the terms of the agreement entered into between the parties on 30-03-2000, in continuation with the agreement entered into on 30-3-2001, it transpires that certain events were taken care of as certainty by the parties. The retirement of Mr. Philp, Mr. Merchant was a certainty as provided in clause 24(b) of the deed dated 30-3-2000. Special terms were agreed between the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930