Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prakash Motwani Vs ITO (ITAT Agra)
Related Assessment Year :
RELEVANT PARAGRAPH 1. There being difference of opinion between the Members, the following questions were referred for the opinion of the Third Member:- 1. Whether, in the given facts and circumstances of the case, addition of Rs. 2,95,000/- on account of alleged undisclosed advance is justified or not ? 2. Whether, in the given facts and circumstances of the case, addition of Rs. 1,00,000/- for alleged unexplained stock found during the survey is justified or not? 3. Whether, since learned JM has admitted the quantum addition, the corresponding penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) is to be cancelled/...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930