Gujarat High Court

6 Month limitation period commences from the date of receipt of order sought to be rectified by assessee

Liladhar T Khushlani Vs Commissioner or Customs (Gujrat High Court at Ahemdabad)

Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order passed by the learned Central, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench, Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to as CESTAT) dated 18/08/2015 by which the learned CESTAT has dismissed the rectification application on the ground that the said application has been preferr...

Read More

HC Judgment on Addition for Sham Transaction in the hand of Partners

CIT Vs Vision Finstocks Ltd (Gujarat High Court at Ahmedabad)

CIT (Appeals) in a detailed judgement, reversed the order of the Assessing Officer holding that if at all the transaction was held to be sham, the additions can be made in the case of the firm and not the partners. ...

Read More

It’s wholly illogical to limit PAN corrections in TDS statement to only two alphabets or numbers

Purnima Advertising Agency pvt ltd (s) Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Gujarat High Court)

The petitioner has challenged the action of the respondent in not permitting the petitioner to correct the error in mentioning the Permanent Account Number (PAN for short) of one of the agencies to whom the petitioner had made multiple payments during the relevant financial period for which deduction of tax at source was necessary....

Read More

Interest on NPAs: RBI Directions U/s. 45Q of RBI Act prevail over sec. 145 of IT Act, 1961

Pr CIT Vs Shri Mahila Sewa Sahakari Bank Ltd (Gujarat High Court)

Appellant contended that section 43D of the Act itself recognises recognition of taxability of such interest and that when a specific provision in the nature of section 43D of the Act has been made, and entities like the assessee are excluded from the purview thereof, the assessee cannot indirectly claim benefit which would amount to [&he...

Read More

Royal Buggy used by royal family for ceremonial occasions is exempt from Wealth Tax

Shantadevi p. Gaekwad Vs W.T.O (Gujarat High Court at Ahmedabad)

This appeal is filed by the assessee challenging the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal for short) dated 26.9.2001. Appeal was admitted for consideration of following substantial question of law....

Read More

Principle of Mutuality applies to Club run by a Company

Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs Karnavati Club Ltd. (Gujarat High Court)

This Tax Appeal is filed challenging the judgement of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 28.08.2006. The Tax Appeal has been taken up for consideration of following substantial questions of law: [A] “Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in confirming the order passed by the CIT(A) deleting the addition of [&h...

Read More

Whether reassessment proceedings can be initiated on basis of CIT(A)’s directions

Raghunath Devchand Patil Vs Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax (Gujarat High Court)

It is the case on behalf of the petitioner that the assessment for A.Y 2008-2009 is sought to be reopen beyond the period of six years, solely on the directions issued by the learned CIT [A], which has been subsequently set-aside by the learned Tribunal. It is submitted that otherwise, the re-assessment proceedings beyond six years is not...

Read More

Mere Rejection of a Claim would not attract Penalty

Commissioner of Income Tax-Vododara-2 Vs ORG Informatics Limited (Gujarat High Court at Ahmedabad)

The Department further initiated penalty proceedings against the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act on ground that the assessee failed to offer explanation for making such a claim. It was noted that once the claim was rejected the onus was on the assessee to dislodge the revertible presumption of the claim of concealme...

Read More

Donation to uplift living condition of manual scavengers form part of Corpus despite no specific instruction

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Gujarat Rural Industries Marketing Corporation (Gujarat High Court)

The issue is one, namely, whether the assessee was entitled to claim benefit of section 11(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act,1961 with respect to Government grant of Rs. 8.97 crores received during the assessment year in question. ...

Read More

Reassessment notice not becomes invalid for delay by Postal Authority

Rajesh Sunderdas Vaswani Vs. C.P. Meena, Dy. CIT & Ors. (Gujarat High Court)

They have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. Facts may be noted from Special Civil Application No. 2548 of 2016....

Read More
Page 1 of 3112345...102030...Last »

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,453)
Company Law (3,346)
Custom Duty (6,574)
DGFT (3,417)
Excise Duty (4,040)
Fema / RBI (3,236)
Finance (3,412)
Income Tax (24,907)
SEBI (2,720)
Service Tax (3,278)