Late claims can not be rejected by the insurance companies mechanically -IRDA

Ref- IRDA/HLTH/MISC/CIR/216/09/2011 ,  Date: 20.09.2011

CIRCULAR

To: All life Insurers and non-life insurers

Re: Delay in claim intimation/documents submission with respect to

i. All life insurance contracts and

ii.            All Non-life individual and group insurance contracts

The Authority has been receiving several complaints that claims are being rejected on the ground of delayed submission of intimation and documents.

The current contractual obligation imposing the condition that the claims shall be intimated to the insurer with prescribed documents within a specified number of days is necessary for insurers for effecting various post claim activities like investigation, loss assessment, provisioning, claim settlement etc. However, this condition should not prevent settlement of genuine claims, particularly when there is delay in intimation or   in submission of documents due t0 unavoidable circumstances.

The insurers’ decision to reject a claim shall be based on sound logic and valid grounds. It may be noted that such limitation clause does not work in isolation and is not absolute. One needs to see the merits and good spirit of the clause, without compromising on bad claims. Rejection of claims on purely technical grounds in a mechanical fashion will result in policyholders losing confidence in the insurance industry, giving rise to excessive litigation.

Therefore, it is advised that all insurers need to develop a sound mechanism of their own to handle such claims with utmost care and caution. It is also advised that the insurers must not repudiate such claims unless and until the reasons of delay are specifically ascertained, recorded and the insurers should satisfy themselves that the delayed claims would have otherwise been rejected even if reported in time.

The insurers are advised to incorporate additional wordings in the policy documents, suitably enunciating insurers’ stand to condone delay on merit for delayed claims where the delay is proved to be for reasons beyond the control of the insured.

Source- IRDA

Related posts:

1. Irda rejected Sebi’s ban on selling of ULIP by life insurance companies
2. IRDA not in favour of allowing initial public offers by by insurance companies who have been in business for less than t
3. Insurance – Submission of Business Information related to Policies, premium, claims and Offices of General Insurance Companies
4. IRDA asks insurance companies to no to do business with corporate agents who failed to register PAN with it
5. Edelweiss Tokio Life Insurance Company Limited Registered with IRDA to carry the Life Insurance business in India