Income Tax Judgment of SC, HC and ITAT

Section 80HHC – SC reverses Bomaby HC judgment in Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals, DEPB Face value covered U/s. 28(iiib)

CIT vs Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals (SC) - In an unconfirmed report from Our one of Lawyer friend it come to our knowledge that SC has on 08.02.2012 revered Bombay High Court Judgment in the case of CIT vs Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals and confirming the decision of Special bench of ITAT Mumbai held as follows:- Objective of DEPB scheme is to neutralize the incidence of customs duty on the import content of the export products. Hence, it has direct nexus with th..
Full Article

Loss from windmill business can be set off against other heads of income

DCIT Vs. M/s. Bellad & Co. (ITAT Bangalore) - The assessee is a partnership firm dealing in automobiles and Sony products and also into generation of electricity from windmills. The assessee filed its return of income for AY 2007-08 declaring income of Rs.11,52,410/- after setting off of depreciation loss pertaining to windmill installed during the financial year relevant to assessment year under appeal. The AO, in the assessment completed, disallowed loss of Rs. 1,22,..
Full Article

Bank Guarantee Commission not liable to TDS U/s. 194H as it is is not a transaction between principal and agent

Kotak Securities Limited vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) - When we look at the connotations of expression ‘commission or brokerage’ in its cognate sense, as in the light of the principle of noscitur a sociis as we are obliged to, in our considered view, scope of expression ‘commission’, for this purpose, will be confined to ‘an allowance, recompense or reward made to agents, factors and brokers and others for effecting sales and carrying out business transactions’ an..
Full Article

Once tax has not been deducted and even if such tax has been paid by the deductee, disallowance u/s.40[a][ia] can still be made.

ACIT vs. DICGC Ltd (ITAT Mumbai) - Sec.201 deals with the mode of recovery of taxes and once tax due has already been paid then the same demand cannot be enforced again. However, sec.40[a][ia] deals with the disallowance of expenditure itself. Therefore, merely by invoking the Heydon's principle the statutory provisions cannot be rendered redundant. Therefore, we are of the opinion that once tax has not been deducted and even if such tax has been paid by the deductee, di..
Full Article

For section115JA/JB Deduction U/s. 80HHC to be computed with reference to the net profits in the profit and loss account – SC

Al-Kabeer Exports Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)- Reversing the High Court Decision and restoring the Tribunal Special bench Decision ,  It was held that in view of  SC Court’s Order in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Bhari Information Technology Systems (P) Ltd. [S.L.P. (C) No.33750 of 2009] Tribunal was  justified in coming to [...]
Full Article

CIT (A) Guilty of ‘Contempt’ For Not Following ITAT Verdict

Cargo Handling Private Workers Pool vs. DCIT (ITAT Vizag) - Since the Income tax Appellate Tribunal is exercising judicial functions, it is now settled that it has all powers of Court, i.e. it can issue summons and exercise all the powers vested in the Income tax authorities under section 131 of the Income tax Act. Hence any proceeding before the Income tax Appellate Tribunal shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings.
Full Article

It is not permissible for the executing authority to look beyond the order it is required to execute

Oriental Bank of Commerce (Delhi HC) - We have considered the rival contentions and gone through the record carefully. The order passed under Section 263 became final. Learned Commissioner while exercising the powers under Section 263 has decided the issue himself and directed the Assessing Officer to re-compute the income on the basis of his decision. He has not relegated the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication.
Full Article

Assessee has right to plan its affairs in such a manner which may result in payment of least tax possible

CIT Vs. Rajan Nanda (Delhi HC) -Every assessee has right to plan its affairs in such a manner which may result in payment of least tax possible, albeit, in conformity with the provisions of Act. It is also permissible to the assessee to take advantage of the gaping holes in the provisions of the Act. The job of the Court is to simply look at the provisions of the Act and to see whether these provisions allow the assessee to arrange their affairs to ensure lesser payment..
Full Article

Page 1 of 28112345...102030...Last »
Copyright © TaxGuru 2011. All Rights Reserved.
About Us - Advertise - Privacy Policy - Back to top