M/s. Bansal Wire Industries Ltd. & ANR Vs. State of U.P. & Ors (Supreme Court) – UP Trade Tax – stainless steel wire is not covered within entry (ix) of clause (iv) of Section 14 of Central Sales Tax Act: the language used in entry no. (ix) is plain and unambiguous and that the items which are mentioned there are “tools, alloy and special steel”. By using the words “of any of the above categories” in entry Nos. (ix) would refer to entries (i) to (viii) and it cannot and does not refer to entry no (xv).

While the intentions of the State Government are clear as to non levy of VAT on Fabric, but due to some misdrafting of the rules and notifications, the general public is put under severe confusion as to whether a specific levy is applicable to it or not. In the case of Fabric, the same is the situation. After all amendments, the position of law that remains on the statute book. This situation has first arrived when Entry-45 of Schedule A which contains Fabric was amended in such a way that declared goods were removed from Schedule A and shifted to Schedule “C” by bifurcating the existing entry 101 into two parts

Ever Since the rate of excise duty on fabric under Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance)(AED-GSI) Act, 1957 was lowered to NIL % w.e.f._01-03-2006 it was widely perceived by the Textile Industry (Fabric) that the levy of state VAT on fabric is now just a matter of time, particularly when this AED levy on fabric was in lieu of state sales tax (VAT). However, the State Government just could not levy VAT on Fabric because though the rate of AED-GSI was lowered to NIL%, the items of fabric continue to remain listed in the Schedule to the AED-GSI ACT. What is the importance of this listing in Schedule to the AED-GSI Act 1957 ?.

The powers of Excise and Taxation inspectors in Punjab have been enhanced till 31st December 2011. The Excise and Taxation Inspectors have been appointed as designated officers u/s 11,13,14,26,27,28,29,30,31,32, 36, 38, 39, 40,41,45, 46,47, 48, 49, 52,53,54,55,56, 57, 58,59, 60, 66,76,77 and 83 till December 2011.

No. VAT-1511/CR. 64/Taxation-1. – The liquor covered by entry 1, 2 and 3 of Schedule D of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 are purchased from the registered dealers within State and tax is paid or has become payable on purchase of liquor at earlier stage.

No. VAT 1511/CR 58/ Taxation-1 These rules may be called the Maharashtra Value Added Tax (Third Amendment) Rules, 2011 and they shall come into force with effect from the date 1st May 2011. These rules amends rule 53 , 54, 55A and insert rule 60A after rule 60.

Trade Cir. No. 8T of 2011, Mumbai, Dt. 04.05.2011 A Scheme for taxation of liquor was announced in the budget for 2011-12 by the Hon’ble Dy. Chief Minister. To give effect to this, amendments are made to the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 and Rules, 2005. The Scheme and the amendments are as follows:

With the Left losing power in West Bengal, the Empowered Group of State Finance Ministers, which is currently engaged in building a consensus on the GST, will have to find a replacement for Asim Dasgupta who has been heading the body since its inception. As West Bengal Finance Minister, Mr. Dasgupta was involved with the Empowered Group for more than a decade. Earlier, he was the convenor of the VAT panel and played a key role in implementing the new tax regime.

Karnataka today became the first state in the country to launch an e-payment system for commercial tax payers. Speaking at the launch, Reserve Bank of India Deputy Governor Shyamala Gopinath wanted such a system to be adopted by other states. The system enables dealers to remit their commercial taxes anytime, anywhere, without physically approaching an office of the Commercial Taxes Department (CTD).

As we know C forms are required to be submitted by a seller with the sales tax authorities after obtaining the same from the purchaser of goods if the sale is an interstate sales and CST has been charged at concessional rate of 2% as per the requirement of section 8(4) of CST Act 1956. Sometimes a dealer if has made an interstate sales at concessional rate of CST against C form then afterwards, the purchaser doesnot provide the requisite C form to the seller then in such case difficulties are faced by the seller at the time of finalizing of his assessment proceedings.