Corporate Law judiciary-2

Trust Cannot File Complaint under Consumer Protection Act,1986: SC

Pratibha Pratisthan & Ors. Vs Manager, Canara Bank & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)

Section 2 (c) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 provides for a complainant making a complaint, inter alia, for an unfair trade practice or a restrictive trade practice adopted by any trader or service provider; a complaint in respect of goods (bought by a complainant) suffering from one or more defects; ...

Read More

Delhi HC order on Online Access to Legislations

Union of India Vs Vansh Sharad Gupta (Delhi High Court)

The present matter has brought forth the problems faced by citizens in free access to accurate and comprehensive sets of laws in India. The availability of accurate legal texts, at minimal cost, is fundamental to the rule of law and a basic responsibility of the Government. With the advent of the internet, it is imperative that the Govern...

Read More

Petition under IBC 2016 cannot be withdrawn by mutual settlement: NCLT

Re. Parker Hannifin India Private Limited (NCLT Kolkata)

After admission of Petition under IBC 2016, the nature of petition changes to representative suit and the lis does not remain only between Operational Creditor and Operational Debtor. Therefore, Operational Creditor and Operational Debtor alone have no right to withdraw the Petition after admission....

Read More
Posted Under: Corporate Law | |

No predatory pricing by WhatsApp by not charging any subscription fee

Shri Vinod Kumar Gupta, Chartered Accountant Vs. WhatsApp Inc. (Competition Commission of India)

The Informant is stated to be a Chartered Accountant and has filed the present information on behalf of Fight for Transparency Society. As per the information, OP is a provider of consumer communication services via a mobile app called ‘WhatsApp’ which is a proprietary, cross-platform,, encrypted instant messaging services for smartph...

Read More

CCI imposes penalty for anti-competitive conduct on Hyundai Motor

Fx Enterprise Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Hyundai Motor India Limited (Competition Commission of India)

CCI issues order against Hyundai Motor India Limited (HMIL) for anti-competitive conduct, imposes penalty of Rs. 87 crore for the anti-competitive conduct....

Read More

CIC directs CBDT to educate concerned officials about RTI Law

Mr. Radha Raman Tripathy Vs. CPIO (Central Information Commission)

Commissiono instructs CBDT to convene periodic conferences/ seminars to sensitise, familiarise and educate the concerned officials about the relevant provisions of the RTI Act, 2005 for effective discharge of its duties and responsibilities....

Read More

Cheque dishonour – Section 138 complaint not maintainable if Bank A/c was locked by statutory authority

Ceasefire Industries Ltd. Vs State & Ors. (Delhi High Court)

The provision contained in section 138 of the N.I. Act makes it clear that it is not every return of a cheque unpaid which leads to prosecution of an offence under the said provision of law. ...

Read More

Free Services by Reliance Jio is not Anti-Competitive: CCI

Bharti Airtel Limited Vs. Reliance Industries Limited & Other (Competition Commission of India)

Join GST Online Certification Course by GST Professionals & TaxGuru.in – Batch II Commission notes that providing free services cannot by itself raise competition concerns unless the same is offered by a dominant enterprise and shown to be tainted with an anti-competitive objective of excluding competition/ competitors, which does n...

Read More

Provide Info on Demonetization under RTI: CIC to Dept of Posts

Ramswaroop Vs PIO, Department of Posts (Central Information Commission)

The CIC, in the case of Ramswaroop Vs PIO, Department of Posts, has directed the authority concerned to provide information regarding the number of currency notes exchanged during the demonetization period to the petitioner since demonetization had a huge impact on the everyday life of every citizen of the nation. ...

Read More

CIC not to direct RBI To disclose defaulters & NPAs List till SC Verdict

A full-Bench of the Central Information Commission recently refused to direct the RBI to disclose list of defaulters and non-performing assets, in view of a similar issue being under consideration before the Supreme Court in the case of Center for Public Interest Litigation v. Housing and Urban Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors., WP(s) (...

Read More
Page 1 of 5812345...102030...Last »

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (3,401)
Company Law (3,300)
Custom Duty (6,465)
DGFT (3,371)
Excise Duty (4,011)
Fema / RBI (3,191)
Finance (3,348)
Income Tax (24,682)
SEBI (2,686)
Service Tax (3,273)