The decision relates to deductibility of excise duty u/s 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Section 43-B requires cumulative existence of following; The deduction claimed by the Assessee must be otherwise allowable under the other provisions of the Act.
Background It is a matter relating to validity of re-opening of assessment on a technical ground in the case of Mayurbhai Mangaldas Patel v ITO. The learned Ahemdabad ITAT Bench has noted all the facts and circumstances of the case and the law as applicable in very clear manner. It has kept some issues open […]
A reader should be able to come to his / her own conclusion by applying the legislative enactments and judicial pronouncements to the facts of the case. While re-producing any portion of legislative enactment or judicial pronouncement, it is para phrased and emphasis is supplied by way of underline.
You would be aware that, recently Supreme Court upheld the decision of Delhi High Court in the case of Fomrula One that it does have Permanent Establishment [PE] in India.
A reader should be able to come to his / her own conclusion by applying the legislative enactments and judicial pronouncements to the facts of the case. While re-producing any portion of legislative enactment or judicial pronouncement, it is para phrased and emphasis is supplied by way of underline.
Section 269ST as being proposed in the budget 2017, makes acceptance of Rs. 3,00,000/- in cash as an offence. There are no caveats like it is applicable only for business receipt etc.
In this very case, the date on which the developer obtained a commencement certificate is not within the accounting year ending 31st March, 1996. At the same time, if one reads the contract as a whole, it is clear that a dichotomy is contemplated between limited Power of Attorney authorising the developer to deal with the property vide para 8 and an irrevocable licence to enter upon the property after the developer obtains the requisite approvals of various authorities.
Apex Judiciary has given a new year gift by pronouncing 2 important judgments, both by constitution bench of 7 members dated January 2, 2017. 1. Re-promulgation of ordinances is invalid and is fraud on constitution 2. A candidate can-not ask for votes in the name of religion, language, caste etc.
The power to charge fees under the provisions of section 234E of the Act while processing the TDS statements, was dwelled upon by the Legislature by way of insertion of clause (c) to section 200A(1) of the Act by the Finance Act, 2015 w.e.f. 01.06.2015. Accordingly, we hold that where the Assessing Officer has processed the TDS statements filed by the deductor, which admittedly, were filed belatedly but before insertion of clause (c) to section 200A(1) of the Act w.e.f. 01.06.2015, then in such cases, the Assessing Officer is not empowered to charge fees under section 234E of the Act while processing the TDS returns filed by the deductor.
In general, for a CA, the nature of work is Ascertainment of facts and Apply principles Principles = provisions of various laws, auditing standards, accounting standards, rules regulations etc. (principles).
