In our considered opinion, exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Act can be claimed by an assessee without applying for registration under Section 12A of the Act as it is not required to fulfil the conditions mentioned under Section 11 of the Act while claiming exemption under Section 10(23C) (vi) of the Act.

No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the concerned regulator/Institute for LLP Name approval/incorporation General Circular no. 40/2012, dated 17-12-2012 In continuation of this Ministry’s Circular No. 2/2012, dated 1st March, 2012 on registration of companies or LLPs where one of their objects is to carry on the profession of Chartered Accountant, Company Secretary, Cost Accountant, Architect, [...]

CA Nitin Gupta IN CASE OF SERVICE RECEIVER IN CASE OF REVERSE CHARGE • WHERE PAYMENT IS MADE TO THE SERVICE PROVIDER, WITHIN 6 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF INVOICE   POT = PAYMENT BASIS •WHERE PAYMENT IS NOT MADE TO THE S.P., WITHIN 6 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF INVOICE

Undoubtedly an order of assessment which has been passed for a subsequent assessment year may furnish a foundation to reopen an assessment for an earlier assessment year. However, there must be some new facts which come to light in the course of assessment for the subsequent assessment year which emerge in the order of assessment.

24X7 Customs Clearance , Mandatory E-payment of Customs duty, E-helpline, Measures to Check Tax Evasion , Measures to Check Black , money, E-Filing of Returns, Centralised Processing Centre (CPC) , Payment of Direct Taxes Through ATMs , Online Tax Help , Communication Strategy for school children

The Court took into consideration the definition of ‘interest’ under section 2(28A) of the Act and also analysed the contents of two circulars issued by the CBDT, being No. 65 dated 02.09.1971 and the subsequent one dated 22.03.1993 (Circular No. 647)(sic), and confirmed the reasoning of the Tribunal that discounting charges did not amount to interest and was not subject to tax.

NOTIFICATION NO. 55/2012 Whereas the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (iii) of sub-section (4) of section 80-IA of the Income-tax Act, 1961(43 of 1961)(hereinafter referred to as the said Act), has framed and notified a scheme for industrial park, by the notifications of the Government of India in the Ministry of Commerce and Industry (Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion) vide number S.O. 193 (E), dated the 30th March, 1999 for the period beginning on the 1st day of April, 1997 and ending on the 31st day of March 2002 and vide number S.O.354(E) dated the 31st day of March, 2006;

In the case under consideration, the assessee placed before the ld. CIT(A), certain additional evidence and admittedly, the said documents were not submitted before the AO. The powers of the CIT(A) in terms of rule 46A to admit fresh evidence, entail an element of discretion which is required to be exercised in a judicious manner.

Section 41(1) is a deeming fiction and seeks to tax receipts or benefit which may not strictly be ‘income’, the burden to prove that a particular benefit or receipt falls within the four corners of the provisions of section 41(1) lies upon the revenue.

In Divi’s Laboratories Ltd.’s case (supra), it was held that commission paid to a non-resident agent for services rendered outside India is not chargeable to tax in India and that hence, no disallowance can be made.